It's 'Back to Business' for Rape Crisis Centers
Sexual assault agencies celebrate veto override, get back to work
Staff members of rape crisis centers and sexual assault agencies can breathe easier after the South Carolina House and Senate overrode Gov. Nikki Haley’s Veto 51, which cut about $500,000 to the 15 agencies across the state.
The veto would have come after three consecutive years of cuts to sexual assault agencies’ budgets. These cuts would have forced one agency, People Against Rape of Charleston, to close its doors.
“It means we can continue,” said Melonea Marek, executive director of People Against Rape. “Our financial worries are never too far away, but this means we can exhale. We won’t have to stop our education program or close our doors.”
Marek cited the number of victims that spoke out against the vetoes as a huge push for overrides, and said hearing from a victim is the most effective form of advocacy.
She added that having Sen. Joel Lourie and Rep. Joan Brady as “champions for [the] program” was invaluable.
“Having a unanimous vote in the House was great,” she said. “The outcome has been fantastic.”
Ginny Waller, executive director of Sexual Trauma Services of the Midlands, said her organization is back on track.
“We’re very pleased, of course, and our focus now is getting back to business,” she said. “It’s been a long few weeks, but we’re very satisfied.”
Waller added: “It’s amazing to watch the process, it was an all-male Senate that overrode the Governor's veto...Hopefully we can educate Gov. Haley in the coming year.”
Joyce Hart, executive director of Rape Crisis Center in Myrtle Beach, agrees.
“We’re excited and it’s just good news,” Hart said. “It’s that much less of a struggle.”
“It’s maybe something she’ll think about before she’ll try to do it again,” Hart said of Haley’s cuts. “She knows she doesn’t have a foothold for axing every dime we get.”
Haley sparked a backlash on Tuesday from Democrats and victims advocates for referring to sexual assault agencies on her Facebook page as “special interests.”
Lourie, D-Richland, on Wednesday, suggested Gov. Haley “stay off Facebook.”
“To argue that the governor isn't supportive of victims is, on its face, absurd and shows how far political opponents will go to criticize the governor regardless of the facts,” said Haley's spokesman Rob Godfrey.
Godfrey said Haley “signed off on increased funding for both rape centers and domestic violence prosecution in the budget because it's the right thing to do.”
Laura
1:28 pm on Friday, July 20, 2012
God does answer prayers!
maizenbluedoc
7:46 pm on Friday, July 20, 2012
I guess the taxpayers answered, albeit coerced.
bargeman
8:58 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012
I think they need to take the money and give each rape victim a course for CWP.a light weight stubnose 38 Special with 500 rounds of ammo. Do not lock the rapist up just tell the victim where he is at 4 times a day. This program would save the taxpayers millions of dollars a year. Just think about it,justice done .no jail to support them, no trial where a sorry juor could let them off. The victim could sleep good never worring about him coming back and he would never sleep good wondering when she will show up and kill him.
JoSCh
11:47 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012
Surely you're only talking about "forcible rape" right? I mean, if we're going to throw out the Bill of Rights I think we should at least get an explicit definition of your modern GOP rules.
stanley seigler
3:09 pm on Saturday, July 21, 2012
@bargeman: 'I think they need to take the money and give each rape victim a course for CWP...'
find myself in a strange, uncomfortable, position: agreeing with bargeman...then i would also like to see vigilante law (be still my bleeding heart)...but/and;
i am sure barge and all see the practical and constitutional problems/issues with its implementation...perhaps a modification/amendment will work:
pass legislation to require females to have a concealed weapon and make it illegal for males to possess a gun...
both barge's original and the modification are obviously facetious...but maybe some merit in facetious and attempts at humor thoughts...
maizenbluedoc
4:18 pm on Saturday, July 21, 2012
stanley: I believe they had a type of vigilante law in the wild west, yet that didn't stop people from committing crimes against others. This is still practiced in Mexico, resulting in 50K+ murders, yet the crime goes on. Rationale?
stanley seigler
7:42 pm on Saturday, July 21, 2012
@maizenbluedoc: '...they had a type of vigilante law...didn't stop people from committing crimes...yet the crime goes on. Rationale?'
didn't say it worked...said i liked it...reflections on the 'wild west' (and aurora, columbine, etc) reveals reasons why we should have more gun control...
re rationale: where's the rationale that arming everyone would result in fewer murders...the more guns on the street the more violence...eg, mexico.
Imlucky_2
9:22 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012
Legally concealed weapons should not be confused with "guns on the streets". Statistics show CWP carriers are among the most law-abiding people in the country.
One may "control" (eg: take away) the guns owned by our country's law-abiding citizens, but what do you do about the guns held by the criminals. The very definition of a criminal defies gun control for any but the innocent.